What methods are used to amend the constitution?

The process of amending a constitution in North Dakota specifically involves actions by both the legislature and the people. This means that any proposed amendments can be initiated by legislative approval, but they must also be ratified through a popular vote by the citizens of the state.

This method ensures that any changes to the governing document reflect the will of both elected representatives and the general populace, emphasizing a democratic process. The involvement of the people is especially important, as amendments can significantly impact their rights and governance.

In contrast, other methods mentioned do not align with the constitutional amendment procedures recognized in North Dakota. For instance, judicial review pertains to the ability of courts to interpret laws and assess their constitutionality, while executive orders are directives issued by the executive branch without legislative approval. These methods do not provide a framework for amending the constitution.

The role of the Governor's mandate and the concept of a popular vote are not in the direct process of amending the constitution, as a simple mandate does not inherently involve a structured amendment process involving the legislature or formal voting on constitutional changes. Therefore, understanding that amendments need both legislative proposals and citizen approval clarifies why this is the correct answer regarding constitutional amendments in North Dakota.