What was the biggest struggle at the state's constitutional convention?

The biggest struggle at North Dakota's constitutional convention centered around the joint commission to distribute territorial property. This issue was crucial as the convention was tasked with determining how to allocate the assets and resources that were held by the territorial government following the transition to statehood. Given the varied interests of different groups and regions within the territory, reaching an agreement on how property and assets would be divided proved to be a complex and contentious process.

The topic of territorial property ties directly into broader themes of governance and resource management, which can significantly impact the economic viability and political stability of the new state. Disputes over resource allocation can lead to tensions among different factions, making it a pivotal and oftentimes polarizing topic during the convention.

Other options, such as balancing state and federal laws, creating a budget, and diversifying the economy, are important issues in the context of state governance and development, but they were not the primary focus of the debates during the state’s constitutional convention. The central struggle revolved around ensuring fair and equitable distribution of property, which had immediate implications for the economic and political landscape of North Dakota as it transitioned into statehood.